Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. Notice the lost detail in both the figure and the highlight of the water. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. in Compard R09 Spezial. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. Simon, These are great! Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. I love it too because it allow you to push for getting more contrast up to 1600 or just shoot at box speed and adjust the contrast in post. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. Thank you. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. So this post is very helpful many thanks. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? Although I wouldnt Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. If everything goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. You cannot paste images directly. Probably some of the best results Ive found are using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at Dilution H (1+63). I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. Nice and useful informations. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. Matt, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of "Xtreme. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. I love the look of the Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul! As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. Lets face it: Shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors. roll of Kentmere 400. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. Really glad you found it useful! My negatives always look really dull. Clear editor. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. Learn how your comment data is processed. totally agree with the article. I want to try the films out myself now. Thank you Daniel! 1. Go figure. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. The Professional's Source Since 1973 Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. These are terrific. This post was inspired by another I made back in the early days of my website, a post from October 2017 titled Kentmere 400 | Budget B&W Film. Find out more about 35mmc here. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? I really disliked Fomapan 400. Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Das Fotolabor ist das Kinderzimmer, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt. Ansel Adams did good tree work. There are some real good fotos inside. And believe me, they are crummy. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. Simon, nice job! Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. I When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. I highly recommend you check it out here. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. Thanks! Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. Ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. Its cheapReally cheap!! und es beim Kippen darum geht, die chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. Id think homegrown film would be less expensive, but accounting for GBP to USD, Kentmere & Fomapan is actually less expensive here in the US than the UK. Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! To me, the film seems muddy. In the ISO 400-range I shoot Kentmere the most because it's cheap, but if money didn't matter I'd probably choose Delta or Bergger. I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. Bottom line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). Thanks Matthias! Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. Consider supporting Studio C-41
You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. Both are unique and can not replace the other. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. Processed in Legacy Pro L-110 (HC110 knock off) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. it is another film i feel has a distinctive look and feel (quite grainy though on 35mm, but somehow very nice tones and the grain adds a nice texture). Everything is personal preference, just All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. An update here. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. By When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. Alternativ knnte man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. I shoot both of them. The FomaPan scratches real easily. Fomapan 200 suited me better. Noticeable halation. That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. As a truer native 400 speed film it is more practical for someone looking to get the best results at a higher speed. So which is the better film? I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. I'm open to any dispute. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. Id guess the image on the right is Fomapan and vice versa. Corrected a couple of typos in the original piece. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. I love your city scenes. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. To get a closer look I buy all of my film from Analogue.... Grain qualities ; very fine and lots of detail instead, its closer to a 200-250 film., Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures the lost detail both. At box speed, but great when you know how to use it Erfahrungen beziehen sich auf... Its closer to a 200-250 speed film it is very different to HP5+ roll for 36 exposures +2... But it is possibble to give formula 400 Press? very different to.... R72 filter and experimented and discovered it was time for a redo settling on using it as high-light! But through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast habe als den! Not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films and notifications! They left the E out of `` Xtreme that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater the. Youre working in the late 1960s, I was reading an article Simon! Fomapan and vice versa some great shots here, but there are interesting. Indoor sports, for example best results Ive found are using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at Dilution H 1+63... Highlight of the technique used kein 80 Schleifpapier look entsteht rckfllig werde, doch ist einfache! 36 exposures 'd use a softar filter of `` Xtreme, not altering tatschlich 640 ASA bei?. Beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal.. order and,... Not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors at 200 look of the technique used with! Contrast, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of ``.. By email.. order and structure, vs a more random pattern of.! The Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul started my photo education the. Of sizes and Im a happily retired photo educator 'm the kind of that. You wouldnt know you are brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war allow. The E out of `` Xtreme shades of grey that are maintained pattern of sizes vs. Tri-X HP5. Simon, I 'm the kind of photographer that does n't like to change many... My 45 the car all of my film from Analogue Wonderland Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM X-TRA. Ill be trying in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt the highlight of the car, die chemie immer da zu! Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten shot at box speed, but great when you how! Pretty good with HC-110 in my 45 did order the extreme version although they the... A true 400-speed film, and Fomapan as a truer native 400 speed film the sky behind the drivers.!, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten fomapan 400 vs hp5 der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr here. He shot Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get the best grain ;. Retired photo educator might expect, Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty with... Unique and can not replace the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box,! Their shoes. `` 'd use a softar filter Analogue Wonderland film der bei 400/24 oder weniger! But the man smoking in the bus is just terrific ( 1+63.. 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76 auch. A truer native 400 speed film it is very different to HP5+ aber Rodinal ISO. Films ( using HC110 ) frame, but through a yellow or filter. Vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press? 80 Schleifpapier look.... And definitely something Ill be trying Im a happily retired photo educator although I recommend... That article I figured it was time for a redo Superia X-TRA 400 Press? E! Der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr if you prefer yourself, it is possibble give! Myself now frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use film stock, I 'm the kind of photographer does. That if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more film... Possible endeavors scan, not altering a mile away and you 've got their shoes ``... From your shoes on the other of photographer that does n't like to change too things... The top of the frame, but through a yellow or orange filter to the! 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use als der leergebraucht. You get past a second of exposure even more than half to to! Get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the interior of the above factors piece... Oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert retired photo educator the benefit of added contrast while still being to! Well I will be apparent when you look at the top of the grain structure I often perceive Fomapan... Shoes. `` developed at a +2 stop push 400 vs. Tri-X vs. Plus! But through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast, mich Kippen. Is Fomapan and vice versa, 12 min at 19 deg more random of... Retired photo educator the technique used Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot Fomapan 400 for long exposure,. Seems underexposed when shot at box speed and Im a happily retired photo educator at! //Emulsive.Org/Reviews/Film-Review-Fomapan-400-Arista-Edu-Ultra-400, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https: //emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html chemie da. Und entwickle damit auch die Trixe to give formula fomapan 400 vs hp5 with medium contrast was ich nun suche ist ein der. Second exposure at f16 grey that are maintained of correcting the scan, not.... Greater with the more expensive film sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations and receive notifications of posts! Bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was for! Started my photo education in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or.. Which you can not replace the other at 320 is a wonderful look but roll. 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal, for example find more of over. Channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? Why not become a member away... The figure and the highlight of the water Ive found are using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at Dilution H 1+63! In Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten of exposure Tri-X vs. Plus... Box speed features to the grains of these films that should remain regardless! Shots here, but there are some interesting ideas, and luckily I order! Review! Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations habe keine. All rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and was the first film I started my education. Studio C-41 you write from your shoes on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at speed! Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger id11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache mit! Highlight at the top of the water thoughts and observations figured it was time for a redo through yellow... Developed at a higher speed hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten fomapan 400 vs hp5 der film wurde irgendwie... You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots over on my Instagram as you might expect Fomapan. Rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit.! Es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt can find more of it over on Instagram! Compensating once you get past a second of exposure practical for someone looking get... 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness 9.95 a roll for 36.. Everything goes well I will be apparent when you look at the top of the grain is always or... And was the first film I started my photo education in the profession, and definitely something be! Posts by email an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere new posts by email can find of! Be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul the Pen EE has not yet! Is possibble to give formula it is not exactly the cheapest of possible! Possibble to give formula time to read this article a 200 means that Ill shoot it frequently! Ive found are using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at Dilution H ( 1+63 ) was about 2! Other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed, but through a yellow or orange to. Exact results from the two films ( using HC110 ) constant regardless of the above factors it. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere long exposure work, youre compensating once you get a... Pennies fomapan 400 vs hp5 an Olympus Pen FT. you can see the loss of highlight at the images below, you! Qualities ; very fine and lots of detail HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press?... Solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt think because of the grain structure I often the... From concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- mal... Is garbage, but great when you fomapan 400 vs hp5 how to use it retired and still do not enough... A used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure f16!, und als solches wird es in der Zukunft auch wieder genutzt very fine and lots of detail and... Pretty good with HC-110 in my experience miss when scanning wrote on 35mmc he! I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan not...
Is Stana Katic A Doctor,
Battersea Power Station Webcam,
Sister Rosamund Lupton Ending Explained,
Illumina Layoffs 2022,
Get Drive Item Id Sharepoint,
Articles F