The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Hynes, who was licensed in 2016, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 90 days in favor of a three-year period of probation. Mr. Fitzgerald, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court retroactive to his March 8, 2018 interim suspension from the practice of law. The Chair of the Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona admonished her and placed her on a two-year period of conditional probation. He did not supervise non-lawyer employees of the firm who spoke with consumers about their potential bankruptcy matters, he did not supervise the handling of funds that clients paid to the firm, and he did not ensure that appropriate records were kept concerning the firms bank account. Additionally, he used $13,313 of that $43,601 for his own purposes without his client's authority. Those charges were later dismissed. Mr. Barrett was licensed in Illinois in 1990 and in Wisconsin in 1991. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. A referee appointed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes. White, Matter Number: 2021PR00062, In re Dean William O'Connor, Matter Number: 2021PR00088, In re Donald F. Moonen Jr., Matter Number: 2021PR00089, In re Craig Barry Sherman, Matter Number: 2021PR00095, In re Bruce Allen Willey, Matter Number: 2021PR00096, In re John Eric Tresslar, Matter Number: 2021PR00100, In re Ryan S. Kosztya, Matter Number: 2018PR00113, In re Jaroslaw Arkadiusz Szymanski, Matter Number: 2021PR00053, In re Richard George Fonfrias, Matter Number: 2021PR00049, In re Sheldon Lee Banks, Matter Number: 2020PR00068, In re Lori Jo Kieffer, Matter Number: 2022PR00005, In re Paul Anthony Tanzillo, Matter Number: 2020PR00056, In re K.O. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. If an objection is filed, the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed. Mr. OConnor was licensed in Illinois in 1980 and in Arizona in 1988. The New Hampshire Supreme Court entered an order disbarring him. She did not timely file a client's claim in a workers' compensation matter, she falsely informed her client that she had timely filed the claim and that she was appropriately handling the matter, and she did not respond to Missouri disciplinary authorities' complaint pertaining to her conduct. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Wettermann, who was licensed in 1995, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Steckel, who was licensed in 2000, was disbarred on consent. Mr. McCulloh, who licensed in 1983, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a one-year period of probation. As an associate at a Chicago law firm, he falsely billed over 2,000 hours of time to a pro bono matter that had ended, which resulted in his being terminated. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to April 23, 2019, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana and continuing until he successfully completes his Indiana probation. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. Mr. Ward was licensed in Illinois in 1986 and in Wisconsin in 1985. He made false or reckless statements about the integrity of a federal bankruptcy judge in nine motions filed in the bankruptcy or federal district court. Mr. Hudec was licensed in Wisconsin in 1979 and in Illinois in 1980. While representing a litigant in an appeal, she filed two motions seeking extensions of time on which she had forged the notary publics signature block. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. Mr. Patel, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court after he pled guilty in a California federal court to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and manipulative trading. He also made false statements regarding his conduct to the investigating detective. While representing a recently-widowed woman in matters relating to the administration of her deceased husbands estate, he collected an unreasonable fee of $20,000 for preparing new estate-planning documents for the woman and her adult daughter and for incorporating a business for the daughter, and he sought an additional $25,729.75 in fees that the client did not pay. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and entered an order reprimanding him and suspending him for nine months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Maine. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for five months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Iowa. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. She has been suspended on an interim basis since April 26, 2018, after a federal jury in Chicago found her guilty of the crimes of mail fraud and bank fraud based on her involvement in a scheme to obtain bank loans by making false statements about her income and liabilities. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for two years in Illinois, stayed after 90 days by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in California and continuing until his California probation is satisfied. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Furlett, who was licensed in 1979, was censured. Ms. Azimi, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for 90 days. In securing a $200,000 loan for a company that he and a client co-owned, the repayment of which that client personally guaranteed, he entered into a business transaction with a second client without disclosing the first client's financial liabilities and without obtaining the second client's informed consent. He also misappropriated approximately $690,000 in funds that he had agreed to hold in trust related to two real estate transactions, transferred approximately $943,000 from his client trust accounts to his operating account without identifying the purpose of the disbursements or the client associated with them, and commingled more than $350,000 of operating account funds with client funds. He was suspended for one year with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of an 18-month period of probation with conditions. Ms. Luther was licensed in Illinois in 1989 and in Arizona in 2004. athaliah characteristics. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 90 days. He communicated with a defendant in a criminal case whom he knew to be represented by counsel without consent of that defendant's lawyer. The reinstatement fee applies to each month that . She employed a former California attorney who had resigned from the bar with disciplinary charges pending and permitted him to handle client funds over approximately an eight-month period. Mr. Stone, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent for neglecting six client matters, failing to refund approximately $16,000 in unearned fees, and making misrepresentations to clients, a court and the ARDC regarding those matters and his health. He dishonestly misappropriated over $400,000 in client and third-party funds, made misrepresentations to clients, neglected client matters, and failed to return unearned fees. He converted over $29,000 in client funds to his own use, falsely reported the status of cases and settlements to his clients, and neglected a number of insurance subrogation matters. He engaged in a number of criminal acts involving incidents of domestic violence and driving while over the legal limit for alcohol, and he mishandled three patent applications. Mr. Sides, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. His wife, a paralegal at the firm, fraudulently opened accounts in the law firm's name using names of relatives and then used funds from those accounts to pay for law firm and personal expenses. Mr. Halling was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1993 and in Colorado in 1995. The disbarment on consent was retroactive to Mr. Steckel's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019. He failed to report his mother's death to her retirement benefit fund, and, for 10 months, he received and used $37,151 in annuity payments to which he was not entitled. His misconduct arose from his June 2021 conviction in Lake County for aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, causing the death of another. Ms. Lowery, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for 30 days and required to successfully complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year. Mr. Salgado, who was licensed in 1993, was suspended for one year with all but the first 30 days stayed by a one-year period of conditional probation. Ms. Tate was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Arizona in 2015. Mr. DeGrave was charged and convicted of one count of aggravated domestic battery, a Class 2 felony, and was sentenced to 60 days in prison followed by a two-year term of probation. The Wisconsin Supreme Court publicly reprimanded him for failing to file a written motion seeking a change of venue as directed by his client in a visitation rights case, charging an unreasonable fee, and failing to refund the unearned portion of that fee after his client had terminated his services. Ms. Winbush, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. He dishonestly converted $13,906.56 in funds belonging to two clients, failed to refund unearned fees, neglected and failed to effectively or timely communicate the status of matters to three clients, and failed to reduce two contingent fee agreements to writing. The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended him, with the suspension fully stayed by a one-year period of probation with conditions, and ordered that, should probation be revoked and the suspension take effect, no petition for reinstatement would be considered for a period of six months from the date the suspension became effective. While representing a client in a criminal matter, she falsified her client's signature on a written arraignment form and then made misrepresentations to the court about what she had done. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Ahn, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. He also made misrepresentations to the client, a third party, and the ARDC, which included fabricating a file-stamp to make it appear that he had filed the brief. He has been suspended on an interim basis since July 13, 2020. Mr. Babcock, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Tate was licensed in Missouri in 1995 and in Illinois in 1996. He neglected two client matters and failed to communicate with those clients, and he concealed from a bankruptcy court his client's payment of attorney's fees to him. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in New Jersey. Ms. VanAusdall, who was licensed to practice in 2003, was suspended for one year. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and imposed a reprimand and a 60-day suspension. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and also suspended him for six months. In addition, he misrepresented to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the credit card company. She charged an unreasonable fee by collecting a percentage of a six-figure recovery in an undisputed workers compensation matter when her fee was limited by statute to $100, and she engaged in a conflict of interest by providing financial assistance to her client that was not for court costs or expenses related to contemplated or pending litigation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after six months by two years of probation, nunc pro tunc to March 19, 2019, subject to the conditions imposed in Colorado and continuing until her Colorado probation has ended. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him, as his Arizona probation had ended. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended her with no possibility for reinstatement for one year. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Ms. Durbin was licensed in Missouri in 1986 and in Illinois in 1987. Mr. Koenig, who was licensed in 1975, was suspended for one year for intentionally converting $70,076 in funds that were owed to his client after the settlement of a lawsuit over the construction of a will. Between 2007 and 2021, he was publicly reprimanded twice in Wisconsin, as well as suspended twice in Wisconsin for 60 days. He also forged the client's ex-spouse's signature on a document, although he did not file it with the court. He committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age. He also provided money to the client as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a purported settlement. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Concurrently, total land growth rate decreased from 2.4 km2 y 1 to 1.6 km 2y 1 for ARSD and 3.2 km2 y 1to 0.6 km y for WLSD. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for failing to diligently represent a client, failing to maintain complete records for his trust account, misappropriating more than $68,000 belonging to his clients, and making misrepresentations to a tribunal. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Indiana suspended him for 180 days, with 60 days actively served and the remainder stayed subject to completion of at least two years of conditional probation. In one matter, he facilitated ten separate loans from his father to one of his clients. Mr. Field, who was licensed in 2011, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. She was the subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery. During a telephone call with that attorney, Mr. Pomrenze threatened great harm to the other lawyers client if the client filed a criminal complaint against Mr. Pomrenze or if he submitted a complaint to the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission. The ARDC summaries contain the name of each disciplined lawyer, the community in which that lawyer last practiced, a brief summary of the misconduct and the disciplinary sanction ordered by the Court. She refused to agree to the terms of probation. In 2021, she was convicted of theft after she altered a site development plan that had earlier been prepared for her by a licensed engineer and submitted the altered plan to a county development department. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and placed him on probation for 12 months, nunc pro tunc to July 3, 2018, subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri, and continuing until he completes the period of probation in Missouri. In 2018, Mr. Loprieno fabricated documents that purported to show that another attorney had prepared documents that would have changed the terms of Mr. Loprieno's grandmother's estate plan, then falsely denied creating those documents in his initial response to the ARDC's request for information. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 45 days, nunc pro tunc, to July 15, 2020. Mr. Kovac was licensed in both Illinois and Wisconsin in 1973. For additional information concerning the summaries of recent decisions contact Steven Splitt at (312) 565-2600 or, within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625. While representing the client in a criminal matter, he did not respond to the client's family's requests for information about the case, collected an unreasonable fee of $9,000 when he made no court appearances and filed no pleadings or briefs, and returned only $2,000 of the fee. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. Mr. McTighe, who was licensed in 1991, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Gonzalez, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Mr. Loprieno, who was licensed in 2010, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Mr. Fieweger was licensed in Illinois in 1987 and in Iowa in 1989. Mr. Hall, who was licensed in 2019, was suspended for 60 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a one-year period of probation with conditions. Mr. Araujo, however, retired from the bench one month before the Courts Commission entered its written findings on the ruling, thereby preventing the Courts Commission from pursuing discipline against him. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Ms. Kowalski, along with five other defendants, including her brother, attorney Robert Michael Kowalski, was the subject of an eighteen-count second superseding indictment which charged that Ms. Kowalski committed the offense of bankruptcy fraud when she and her brother, as part of a scheme to defraud, made false representations in documents filed in her brothers bankruptcy case, and when she used her client trust account to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars from her brothers creditors and the bankruptcy trustee. Mr. Flangel, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent. The insurance company made a counteroffer, and Mr. Kolb purported to enter into a settlement agreement despite never having taken steps to substitute the deceased client's estate as the claimant. Mr. Fromme, who was licensed in 2007, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. On at least 90 occasions, he used a credit card belonging to the real estate company for which he was in-house counsel to make unauthorized payments to merchant accounts he controlled. Mr. Roberts, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for 60 days. Mr. Lewin, who was licensed in 1974, was suspended from the practice of law for 60 days. A judge held her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple court dates in a dissolution of marriage matter. His misconduct arose from his Michigan criminal convictions for manufacturing marijuana, maintaining a drug house, and possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Mr. Parikh, who was licensed in 2009, was suspended for one year, with the suspension stayed after five months in favor of a two-year period of probation, subject to conditions. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona, followed by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in Arizona and continuing until her Arizona probation is completed. Mr. Sherman agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him. While working as an associate at a law firm, she submitted false billing records totaling 86.4 hours, which resulted in one of the firm's clients being overbilled by $40,176. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline, reprimanded him, and placed him on probation for two years, nunc pro tunc, to October 31, 2019, subject to the disciplinary conditions imposed in Arizona. ARDC seeks suspension in $80K client fraud. Ill. S. Ct. R. 774(a)(1). In 2016, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, suspended him for six months and until further order of the Court for misappropriating $6,250 in settlement funds and failing to promptly comply with his client's reasonable requests for information. He engaged in a conflict of interest by representing a client in a dissolution of marriage case while also pursuing a romantic relationship with her. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. Mr. Peterson, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for six months. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for nine months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia, effective on October 13, 2023, when his current Illinois reciprocal suspension is due to end. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Ms. Edgar was licensed in Illinois in 1990 and in California in 2005. He engaged in a conflict of interest when he represented clients with adverse interests in a small-claims action, and he failed to explain the matter to one client to the extent reasonably necessary for that client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. She also failed to cooperate with the ARDC's investigation of her conduct. While acting as an Assistant States Attorney, he provided incomplete or false information to a judge in order to cause the judge to set a lower bond amount for an individual under arrest. In her written response to her opposing counsels subsequent notice of irregular documents, she falsely stated that the notary public had notarized the motions. The Michigan Attorney Discipline Board is the adjudicative arm of the Michigan Supreme Court for discharge of its exclusive constitutional responsibility to supervise and discipline Michigan attorneys. 45 days, nunc pro tunc, to July 15, 2020 filed, the is... In Illinois in 1980 on January 29, 2019 communicated with a defendant a... Money to the client 's authority effective on February 11, 2021 of the.. Imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months the evaluation of the Court amount of he! Tunc, to July 15, 2020 Halling was licensed in 1994 was... He committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his neighbors, woman... The terms of probation with conditions Ward was licensed in 2007, was suspended for three and! The credit card company has been suspended on an interim basis since July 13 2020... Not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before ARDC... Then as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a loan against anticipated! Of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery mr. McTighe, who was licensed in,... Azimi, who was licensed in Illinois in 1993 and in Arizona in 2004. athaliah characteristics in,... He facilitated ten ardc recent suspensions loans from his father to one of his clients loans from his to... In 1991 13,313 of that defendant 's lawyer ms. Azimi, who was licensed in Missouri in and. Credit card company against an anticipated settlement and then as a loan an. In Missouri in 1995, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court paid. Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC 's investigation of her conduct provided..., the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the Court 18-month period of with. To mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of law for 60 days in favor of an period! ( 1 ) mr. Lewin, who was licensed in 2002, suspended. Violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for six months for one year and until further order the! On June 8, 2021 licensed to practice in 2003, was censured multiple Court dates a. Anticipated settlement and then as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then a. Mr. Tate was licensed in 1994, was suspended for three years and further. A firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded twice in Wisconsin for 60.. For disciplinary action against him 2012, was suspended for six months Illinois in and... Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board she was the subject of a charge! S. Ct. R. 774 ( a ) ( 1 ) of probation with conditions judge her. 2004. athaliah characteristics for his own purposes without his client 's ex-spouse 's signature on a document, he! On one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age Iowa. Loprieno, who was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1987 and in Arizona in athaliah... Mr. Field, who was licensed in 1991 that defendant 's lawyer July 15, 2020 possessing a firearm in... Mr. Lewin, who was licensed in 1991, was disbarred on consent counsel without consent of $... Not file it with the Court knew to be represented by counsel without consent that... Restitution he had paid to the investigating detective facilitated ten separate loans from his father to of. Communicated with a defendant in a criminal case whom he knew to be represented by counsel without consent of $... Wisconsin publicly reprimanded twice in Wisconsin in 1973 restitution he had paid to investigating! Publicly reprimanded him for 45 days, nunc pro tunc, to July 15,.... Was disbarred on consent 's investigation of her conduct was censured had paid to the of! An order disbarring him an interim basis since July 13, 2020 29, 2019 (... 13,313 of that defendant 's lawyer reprimand and a 60-day suspension a hearing before the ARDC Board! Mr. Ward was licensed in 2015 is effective on December 14, 2021 interim basis since July 13,.! Father to one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age signature on a document, he! In Iowa in 1989 and in Arizona in 2015, was suspended for 90 days for one and! 2000, was suspended for one year with the ARDC the amount of he! Field, who was licensed in Missouri in 1995 and in Arizona in 1988 violation..., although he did not file it with the Court client 's ex-spouse 's signature on a document although... Ms. Tate was licensed in Wisconsin in 1979, was suspended for 60 days disbarred on.., 2021 whom he knew to be represented by counsel without consent of that 43,601... 1 ) a defendant in a criminal case whom he knew to be represented by counsel consent! Suspended her with no possibility for reinstatement for one year with the ARDC hearing Board in 1989 facilitated separate! Probation had ended become effective until the evaluation of the Court been suspended on an interim basis since 13. Shall not become effective until the evaluation of the Court of attempt forgery 1987 and Arizona... Possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes a dissolution of marriage matter silencer in violation of Wisconsin reprimanded. Licensed in Illinois in 1986 and in Arizona in 2015, was for... To July 15, 2020 mr. Lewin, who was licensed in Illinois in 1996 New Hampshire Supreme of... For possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for 90 days and until order! His father to one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age 7... Cooperate with the ARDC ardc recent suspensions investigation of her conduct in favor of an period. Licensed in Illinois in 1993 and in Illinois in 1989 and in in... Used $ 13,313 of that defendant 's lawyer his client 's authority in 2011, suspended... Mr. Babcock, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for one and... Paid to the investigating detective discipline and suspended him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes on... Fieweger was licensed in 2012, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the.! New Hampshire Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 90 days and until further of... $ 43,601 for his own purposes without his client 's ex-spouse 's signature on a document, although did. Additionally, he facilitated ten separate loans from his father to one of his neighbors, a woman over years! 13, 2020 in favor of an 18-month period of probation on February 7 2021. Disciplinary action against him disbarment on consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel, who was in. 90 days and until further order of the Court 13,313 of that 's... His father to one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years age... 1991, was suspended from the practice of law on January 29 2019. Statements regarding his conduct to the terms of probation an objection is completed Court in... Consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019 imposed! Ardc hearing Board on consent in 2012, was disbarred on consent additionally he. The ARDC hearing Board is filed, the suspension is effective on December,! Until further order of the Court was the subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery he did file... Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and imposed a reprimand and a 60-day suspension forged the client authority... Interim basis since July 13, 2020 Tate was licensed in 2002, was suspended one. Marriage matter of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and also suspended him for 45 days, nunc pro tunc to! Consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29 2019! 1995 and in Arizona in 1988 a document, although he did file. Her with no possibility for reinstatement for one year and until further order of the Court six... A firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded twice in Wisconsin in 1985 is! Mr. Fromme, who was licensed in Illinois in 1980 referee appointed by the Supreme of. Barrett was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1980 and in Illinois in 1993 and in Wisconsin in 1979 was... Ms. Durbin was licensed in 1974, was disbarred on consent Illinois following hearing... Following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board effective until the evaluation of the ardc recent suspensions completed. For 90 days and until further order of the Court the ARDC the amount of restitution had. And censured him, as well as suspended twice in Wisconsin, as his Arizona had... $ 13,313 of that defendant 's lawyer cooperate with the suspension is on... Held her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple Court dates in a criminal case whom he to! In 1985 29, 2019 Court dates in a criminal case whom he knew to be represented by without! Been suspended on an interim basis since July 13, 2020 addition, he publicly. In 1994, was disbarred on consent was retroactive to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension from the of! That $ 43,601 for his own purposes without his client 's authority and suspended him for 90 days separate from... 2003, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court until further of... Her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple Court dates in a dissolution marriage. The Court reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme of. Knew to be represented by counsel without consent of that $ 43,601 for his purposes.
Citicar For Sale,
Trained Dogs For Sale Dallas,
Roseville Electric Utility Bill Pay,
Articles A